Sunday, 22 December 2013

A Coach’s Struggle with the Myth of Archery in Popular Culture

In the current day and age of technology, where videos can be streamed straight to smartphones and tablets, as well as computers, consoles and televisions, it’s almost impossible to walk into archery without prior experience, preconceptions and, in some cases, misconceptions about the sport.  If you haven’t been living under a rock for the past two years, you will have no doubt seen films such as Brave, Avengers Assemble, The Hunger Games and, more recently, its sequel Catching Fire advertised on every second bus stop up and down the country.  The poster of Catching Fire is of particular interest as it shows the female protagonist Katniss Everdeen, pointing a fully drawn bow at the camera. 


Looking at it from a non-archery background, there’s a certain ‘wow’ factor to the poster as the flames dance behind her with a giant Mockingjay – a symbol for the film.  Couple that with the fact that you have the heroine, a strong female who can be idolised, and you’ve got the makings of a good advertisement.  Every little girl probably wants to grab a bow and be Katniss.  Why wouldn’t they?  She’s incredible, isn’t she!  Or is she?

Looking at the poster from an archery related background, there are some details which have been overlooked by the people preparing Katniss for the role.  So what was wrong with her technique, and how can it misinform people about the actual principles for shooting a bow?


Firstly, let’s look at that finger which she has laid over the arrow as it sits on the rest.  One can only assume that, when reading the ‘how to’ on how to shoot a bow, the researchers (and I use that term loosely) thought that the explanation of having one finger above the arrow and two fingers below the arrow applied to both hands and not just the hand pulling the string.  In fact, to shoot this way would, well, hurt.  So much!  I was tempted to give it a bash, just to see how much, but I bottled it at the last moment.  I like the index finger on my bow hand; it has a certain sentimental value. 

Next, moving up the bow arm, she should be looking to rotate the arm so that the crease of the elbow is vertical as oppose to the diagonal angle it will have at the moment.  This will move the forearm out of the path of the string as the arrow is shot.  Moving further up the arm, to the bow shoulder, Katniss should be looking to bring it round more to create a straighter line across the shoulder blades and down the bow arm.  This will allow Katniss to ‘get inside the bow’, creating far better alignment for the shot. 

Finally, Katniss wants to think about keeping her mouth closed.  By keeping the teeth and lips together, the lower jaw won’t be moving up and down, having a massive effect on the consistency of the arrow height in relation to the eye (you know, that thing you use for aiming).

These hints are purely based on the poster of Katniss shooting the poor photographer and whilst we know it’s only a film, it’s a film which influences millions of young minds all around the world.  I’ve taught girls who have wanted to have a bash at archery purely off the back of The Hunger Games so it’s obviously causing interest in the sport.  Perhaps you’re more of an Avengers fan though, and have been inspired by Hawkeye; with his uncanny ability to shoot at high speed without looking where he’s shooting, aiming where he’s shooting or pointing where he’s shooting.  Either way, it’s reinforcing the notion that it’s almost impossible to walk into archery with no prior preconceptions of the sport. 

That is where a coach can come in.  Certainly, it’s wrong to say that a beginner could not walk into an archery range, pick up a bow and shoot it without some degree of success.  Archery dates back as far as the late Mesolithic/ early Neolithic periods when early man first discovered that use of the bow was efficient as a means of hunting and, in some cases, warfare.  It also evolved simultaneously in many different cultures, albeit with different technique and materials, but it’s probably safe to say that the hunters didn’t have the use of a coach to help them develop their skills with a bow.  It’s also probably safe to say that, on some days, their families went hungry.  

We don’t have that problem these days but, given the increasing popularity of the sport and the calibre of the competition, an educated and suitably qualified coach can help you progress as an archer.  They can give you an inside knowledge which you may not otherwise have had; acting as both a friend and mentor, and assisting you to set both realistic and aspiring goals to aim for (excuse the pun).  A coach can help identify areas of improvement and any problems that you may be having in order to help you improve and progress in the sport.  Above all, if you’re walking into archery with any misconceptions about what archery is, a coach can help educate and assist you in learning more about the sport.  

It’s no secret that archery is on the increase in popularity, and it’s no secret that films and television have helped play a large role in that increase in popularity, but whilst it has proven one of archery’s greatest promoters, it has also proven to be a fickle friend by misrepresenting archery and giving the image that ‘you can pick up a bow and you’ll hit the bullseye’.  If truth is told, you probably won’t.  It’s easy to shoot a bow but it’s not easy to shoot a bow well.  However, you have the means to; you have the club, the coaches, and the equipment.  You have everything you need to be a good archer, but you have to make use of it.  You wouldn’t expect to be able to do quadratic equations without first being taught how, just because you saw a picture on a bus stop.  You can’t expect to shoot a bow well without help either, but the positive side of that is that the help is available; you need only ask.

Sunday, 1 December 2013

Back to Basics - Stripping off the bells and whistles...

Now, before we begin, I know bows technically don't have 'bells and whistles' or else they would be somewhat jangly affairs and something of a nuisance on the shooting line.  The bells and whistles are simply a way of saying sights, stabilisers, clickers, doinkers and everything else projecting from the bow which really doesn't 'need' to be.

About a year ago, after shooting Barebow successfully for about five years, I decided a new challenge was in order.  I was shooting a Portsmouth of over 500, averaging around 505 and with a PB of 510.  There was still some considerable way to go before a perfect score of 600, but I was well ahead of any competition on the league tables and so I began to lose any incentive for the challenge.  I know, I should have kept competing with myself, aiming to get further and further up the 500's, but I was getting complacent with it.  I needed a new challenge.

Que, a quick trip to the archery shop to buy sights, stabilisers, v-bars, etc.  I was pretty good without sights, how much better would sights make me?  Not very, would be the answer to that rhetorical question.  In fact, they would even go as far as to make me worse.  My first Portsmouth scored in the 480's.  I'd considered that a bad score by Barebow standards, so I certainly wasn't going to accept it with a fully spec'ed up Recurve bow.

I trained!  I trained hard for three months and went to my first competition with a full Recurve.  I scored 524!  Bonus!  I've beaten my Barebow PB.  It's all uphill from here.  Taking advice from another archer, I attached a clicker to the bow.  I attached it two days before the next competition.  As you can imagine, that didn't work so well for me.  I was back down in the 470's and it had been a very hard felt 66 arrows (including sighters).  I was gutted.

I spent the next nine months battling with the sights, the clicker, the consistent anchor, the lower draw force line (not to mention a recurring shoulder injury) and I was done.  I couldn't get to grips with Olympic Recurve at all.  It's not like I tried it and thought, 'Nope!  This isn't for me'.  I really tried it.  I spent a year trying it, and must have shot thousands of arrows both at club nights and in the garden.  Olympic Recurve really isn't for me!  I didn't enjoy it.  I never enjoyed it as much as shooting Barebow.  It just seemed like a lot of hard work for not a lot of gain.  I was beginning to dislike archery.  I needed to go back which, ironically, is probably going forward.  There's a philosophy in there; we won't dwell on it.

With that in mind,  I stripped everything off again.  I took the bow back to its Barebow basic, and bought myself a new shooting glove (I had been using a tab whilst trying to get to grips with Olympic Recurve).

I must admit, my 'instincts' are a little rusty.  If you go for a year without shooting, that will happen.  Certainly, the muscles are strong.  That's not a problem.  Swimming, cycling, archery; they all help keep the muscles strong.  The instincts, however, are not.  My arrow groupings were on the target, which is good, as I feared they would be literally all over the place.  And then I placed this grouping in the target, and everything about these three arrows just worked.  I knew the moment I released the arrows that they were good.  Perhaps there's hope yet for reviving my Barebow archery career.



That is the kind of shooting I was use to in Barebow archery.  Ironically, I very rarely managed it with Olympic Recurve.  Keep in mind that this was just one end!  The others tended to occupy the red and blue some more.  One arrow even missed the target completely!  I maintain it was bent, although, when tested, it was as straight as an arrow; no pun intended.  Perhaps the bow was playing up!  Surely it can't have been the archer?!

Anyway, I now know I've still got it.  I know I can get it back.  So the journey begins...